Roman Empire Rules Today

[Tigron-X]

Originally Posted by Lawdog

Ah, one insane person being agreed with by another insane person. How cute.

"The law is what I say it is unless 100% of my peers agree."

Megalomaniacal delusions of that depth are hard to fix.

And the guy in the insane asylum who is most admired by the other patients is still just a guy in an insane asylum.

You do realize that you misquoted him, right? And you do realize that the comment represents the paradigm of those assuming governing authority over other men, right?

So wouldn't you also agree that the true insanity is assuming that men can rule over other men justly?

Being that insanity can be defined as doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result, e.g. men ruling other men justly.

[Livefire]

Originally Posted by Lawdog

Ah, one insane person being agreed with by another insane person. How cute.

"The law is what I say it is unless 100% of my peers agree."

Megalomaniacal delusions of that depth are hard to fix.

And the guy in the insane asylum who is most admired by the other patients is still just a guy in an insane asylum.

Lawdog,

Judges say stuff like that to juries all the time......The law is what I say it is! Then juries arent allowed to see the law for themselves. Who's the insane megalomaniac!? They're also liars as well because jury nullification is a right that jurors have.....Brailsford v Georgia, et al....

[netwrkranger]

Lawdog wrote:
Ah, one insane person being agreed with by another insane person. How cute.

"The law is what I say it is unless 100% of my peers agree."

Megalomaniacal delusions of that depth are hard to fix.

And the guy in the insane asylum who is most admired by the other patients is still just a guy in an insane asylum.

You are always free to leave the "insane asylum", Lawdog.

[rottweiler]

The court of record is more than a nail. It is a spike just right for hammering into the heart of ******uous crown bastardry.

Originally Posted by mrg

You have been preaching this Truth righteously of late, sir.

The sound of this good nail being hit square and true on the head is music to my ears.

Thank you.

[rottweiler]

You misquoted me you fool. I said, "The law is what I say it is unless 100% of my peers disagree." You would make an excellent court jester.

Originally Posted by Lawdog

Ah, one insane person being agreed with by another insane person. How cute.

"The law is what I say it is unless 100% of my peers agree."

Megalomaniacal delusions of that depth are hard to fix.

And the guy in the insane asylum who is most admired by the other patients is still just a guy in an insane asylum.

[mrg]

Originally Posted by netwrkranger

You are always free to leave the "insane asylum", Lawdog.

Please do, you'wre dwiving us cwazy you wascal you!



Lawdog "interprets" the Constitution

[mrg]

A republican form of government means a republic.

In a republic the administration of affairs is open to all CITIZENS©.

A court is a republican institution where affairs are administered.

You must administer your affairs of court yourself or waive this right.

MOST PEOPLE, myself included, thought that John signed the Great Charter of English Liberties and became good King John afterwards.

This is wrong.

As soon as John got the rebel barons to disband their armies he waged holy war against them for the rest of his life.

OUR CONSTITUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, thus, must be defended and we must defend it to the best of our ability.

When you invoke a court you must assert your jurisdiction to hold it and cannot let the judge usurp your judicial power.

This means you do not pay an attorney fee to him to conduct your court, you do not submit documents to him for his approval, you do not motion him to move your court, you deny everything he has tried to file and you strike anything that he has attempted to enter of record.

He will not like you.

You are not trying to make friends with him.

Without the judge you can eject attorneys and enter your own orders including a declaratory judgment if no other party appears for court in person.

If a few of us do this we can be hunted down and exterminated.

If thousands of us do this it may succeed.

[Lawdog]

Originally Posted by rottweiler

You misquoted me you fool. I said, "The law is what I say it is unless 100% of my peers disagree." You would make an excellent court jester.

Yeah, I mistyped and put "agree" instead of "disagree." It was about 2am, and I was tired.

Your statement is still ridiculous. The law is what the government says it is, because the legislature writes it, the courts interpret it, and the executive branch enforces it.

No one is allowed to self-decide what the law means. That leads to anarchy.

[robhalford88]

Originally Posted by Lawdog

No one is allowed to self-decide what the law means. That leads to anarchy.

What do YOU call it when the entities you mentioned serve self interest groups and NOT the people?

If that isn't anarchy, then why should we bother to have the system in place?

[mrg]

Originally Posted by Lawdog

Prove it.

Prove it.

Your definition of "self-decide" is...?

Your definition of "anarchy" is...?