IRS and Federal Reserve are Private European Corporations!

[J.W.]

Just more fuel to add to the fire of enlightenment.

[ezrhythm]

Yes that is true as one day America will sadly become a part of the European Union.

[Ice]

Jason,

This is Awesome. Thank you for posting it in the forum.

The movie is being shown around the country and receiving standing ovations.

The "sleepers" are hearing the alarm clock.

Ice

[B Rookard]

I wish you guys would make up your mind.

First the IRS doesn't even exist.

Then it's an agency, but it can only operate here and there.

Then it's a Puerto Rico something-or-other.

Then it's the Virgin Islands.

The Federal Reserve is unlawful.

Now it's lawful, but it's European.

But tomorrow, betcha it'll have been founded by the David Icke's lizard-people.

Do you guys not even think about what it is you're saying half the time? Do you even stop to think just how silly some of this stuff sounds? Do you not even realize that the claims of tax protestors are logically inconsistent? One tax protestor says one thing, another says something which cannot logically co-exist alongside the other tax protestor's statement, and yet you guys somehow think BOTH are correct. Can you guys at least get together and agree on your conspiracy theories? It's really hard to give credence to one conspiracy theory when it flagrantly contradicts another conspiracy theory ... which conspiracy theory are we to believe. A little consistency would be nice fellas.

[J.W.]

Originally Posted by B Rookard

I wish you guys would make up your mind.

First the IRS doesn't even exist.

Then it's an agency, but it can only operate here and there.

Then it's a Puerto Rico something-or-other.

Then it's the Virgin Islands.

The Federal Reserve is unlawful.

Now it's lawful, but it's European.

But tomorrow, betcha it'll have been founded by the David Icke's lizard-people.

Do you guys not even think about what it is you're saying half the time? Do you even stop to think just how silly some of this stuff sounds? Do you not even realize that the claims of tax protestors are logically inconsistent? One tax protestor says one thing, another says something which cannot logically co-exist alongside the other tax protestor's statement, and yet you guys somehow think BOTH are correct. Can you guys at least get together and agree on your conspiracy theories? It's really hard to give credence to one conspiracy theory when it flagrantly contradicts another conspiracy theory ... which conspiracy theory are we to believe. A little consistency would be nice fellas.

B Rookard,

I haven't followed your track record here to date; however, if you keep up the sarcastic sass I will surely flex that which is my digital muscle and see that you find your way to forums of similar droidal think. Although we formally take no sides here, and I certainly take no sides, but after reading your post it is apparent that you are blind to the fact that the Fed let alone the IRS have some anomalies in which case they collectively have some explaining to do. In other words and quoting from a notable flick of the 70's "Soylent Green is people."

Strike 1 for now, but please don't give me a reason to use my digital kung fu against thee as I studied at Wudan and wield the infamous Green Destiny around these parts.

[B Rookard]

Originally Posted by Jason Whitney

B Rookard,

I haven't followed your track record here to date; however, if you keep up the sarcastic sass I will surely flex that which is my digital muscle and see that you find your way to forums of similar droidal think. Although we formally take no sides here, and I certainly take no sides, but after reading your post it is apparent that you are blind to the fact that the Fed let alone the IRS have some anomalies in which case they collectively have some explaining to do. In other words and quoting from a notable flick of the 70's "Soylent Green is people."

Strike 1 for now, but please don't give me a reason to use my digital kung fu against thee as I studied at Wuden and wield the infamous Green Destiny around these parts.

In other words, don't point out any inconsistencies in tax protestor arguments cuz that might make somebody look bad. If I don't agree, then I'm "blind" to the fact ... not "the so-called facts might be wrong."

Ok.

Got it.

[J.W.]

You have cited neither an opposing counter argument nor any credible academic evidence in support of your trash talk. Therefore, pursuant to the Terms of Use and my own personal determination, I tell you that you are out of line and you’d be better served to join your fellow Goose-stepping droidial comrades who dare not to challenge the official version of anything, let alone explore alternative view points, opinions, concerns even when they may be enveloped in what could be described as unorthodoxy and sometimes utter lunacy.

Further, I'm not entirely sure, but so far... I just don't like you. So there.

Lastly, I bet you also believe that there is no such thing as say, global warming, cigarettes doesn’t cause cancer or alternative power sources are 10 to 20 years away.

[weishaupt1776]

Sorry Bud, but you didn't follow the rules in that reply to Jasons presentation:

RULES OF ENGAGMENT

The following maxim shall exist as the supreme law governing debate on the SuiJuris.net message boards: He who leaves the battlefield first looses by default.

A Member initiating (Initiator) a post or responding (Respondent) thereto of which results in a debate especially with regard to Theology or Politics, he/she must be willing and able to participate in a intellectual discussion or debate in respect of the post in question. Initiating of nuisance posts as “cheap shots” is prohibited. In the event SUIJURIS.NET reviews and determines that a member is the Initiator or Respondent regarding a controversial, blatantly false, or unintelligible post, and such has given rise to adversarial commentary wherein the post initiator or respondent willfully disregards his/her duty to respond and adhere to the rules of engagement, then the membership of that particular individual may be subject to suspension. However, if a member has been successfully out-debated that individual’s membership will NOT be subject to suspension.

Should members desire to post theological scriptures for the purpose of education or inspiration, such content should be confined to the Theology/Religion directory of the SUIJURIS.NET message boards. However, should a debate arise then the parties involved shall be subject to above-described rules of engagement.

Read The Terms of Use

[J.W.]

So brother Weis, if I don't have time to bloody up my Green Destiny sword; will you take a moment to Terminate this chap as I'm a bit involved on another project?

Thx man,

J

This should have been B Rookard's signature:

Enter the Flat Earth Society. For over five hundred years humanity has believed the "round Earth" teachings of Efimovich and his followers. But all hope is not lost. For through all that time, a small but diligent band of individuals have preserved the knowledge of our planet's true shape. And now, after centuries in the Dark Ages, we believe that mankind as a whole is once again ready to embrace the truth that has forever been the Flat Earth Society. Using whatever means are deemed necessary and relying heavily on a callous disregard for the lives and well-being of our members, we have slowly but steadily been spreading the news.
But why? Why do we say the Earth is flat, when the vast majority says otherwise? Because we know the truth.

[dawgwise]

..." but after reading your post it is apparent that you are blind to the fact that the Fed let alone the IRS have some anomalies in which case they collectively have some explaining to do." as posted by Jason Whitney

My opinion - Sometimes it is important to help those who otherwise are unable to help themselves. Sadly some people were taught to abhor that which they cannot comprehend. It burns like a fever making the choicest food unpalatable to them. They were taught to be anti-social.

B. Rookard makes one valid point in that there are many anomalies and directions and as you stated Jason, B. Rookard is simply unable to discern that the very presence of those anomalies IS, at very least, one of many problems.

Here is a fact - B. Rookard is unable to to prepare someone's "taxes" and have his work coincide with the IRS 100% of the time. I do not presume this, I know it for sure because it is an impossibility and not even B. Rookard can perform the impossible. The aforestated is but ONE example of the many hidden issues.

With encouragement B. Rookard may place a cool cloth upon his or her forehead, to reduce the raging fever, and find the food to feed that hungry soul.

"You cannot push a cow's head down unless it's drinking water by it's own will."